Open Forum Refuge

Known to cause cancer in California
It is currently Mon Sep 25, 2017 1:07 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 27, 2011 12:22 pm 
Offline
Violent Passivist
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:05 pm
Posts: 26189
Location: Florida Keys
BigMark wrote:
Coincopwife wrote:
details here ... link





The requested topic does not exist.



Link :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:46 am
Posts: 2489
.

These birds are about cooked.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/federal-judge- ... 82024.html

"Today's decision shows that Righthaven's copyright litigation business model is fatally flawed, and we expect the decision to have wide effect on the over 270 other cases Righthaven has brought."




.

_________________
............................................................
I Can See November 2012 From My House.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:34 pm
Posts: 34464
Location: Richmond VA
storm888 wrote:
.

These birds are about cooked.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/federal-judge- ... 82024.html

"Today's decision shows that Righthaven's copyright litigation business model is fatally flawed, and we expect the decision to have wide effect on the over 270 other cases Righthaven has brought."




.


These bottom feeders may be but the others sending out demands for $500-1000 aren't. They have nothing to lose if they don't file suits. If even one out of ten cough up the dough it's very profitable. I'm now dealing with two of them. One good thing about this DU case is that it has given a blueprint for responding to the copycats.

_________________
Defeat the Unindicted Felon

My photos can be found here


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:38 pm
Posts: 14055
Location: The Garage
http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/26/righthaven-ordered-pay-nearly-120000/

:D

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:38 pm
Posts: 14055
Location: The Garage
K6AZ wrote:
storm888 wrote:
.

These birds are about cooked.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/federal-judge- ... 82024.html

"Today's decision shows that Righthaven's copyright litigation business model is fatally flawed, and we expect the decision to have wide effect on the over 270 other cases Righthaven has brought."




.



These bottom feeders may be but the others sending out demands for $500-1000 aren't. They have nothing to lose if they don't file suits. If even one out of ten cough up the dough it's very profitable. I'm now dealing with two of them. One good thing about this DU case is that it has given a blueprint for responding to the copycats.


Ignore or Counter sue.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:38 pm
Posts: 14055
Location: The Garage
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/10/creditor-righthaven/

The financial woes of Las Vegas-based copyright trolling firm Righthaven worsened Saturday when one of the defendants it unsuccessfully sued for infringement asked a judge to allow seizure of the firm’s assets — with the help of the U.S. Marshals, if necessary.

The legal filing dropped moments after the Friday deadline expired for the litigation factory to pay defendant Wayne Hoehn $34,000 in legal fees. Hoehn successfully defended himself against a Righthaven copyright lawsuit seeking large damages for posting the entirety of a Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial to a small online message board.

.... more at the link. :)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:34 pm
Posts: 34464
Location: Richmond VA
Righthaven may be in trouble but the clones who sprung up aren't. They are not law firms and have no intention of suing anyone, they use copy and paste legal threats and though most webmasters are aware of the game it's still a PITA to deal with since any threat to a profitable website must be taken seriously until determined to be frivolous.

_________________
Defeat the Unindicted Felon

My photos can be found here


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:38 pm
Posts: 14055
Location: The Garage
It is still fun to see things like this.

http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/nov/01/marshals-ordered-seize-righthaven-assets/

"Las Vegas copyright infringement lawsuit filer Righthaven LLC’s financial problems grew Tuesday when the federal court in Las Vegas commanded the U.S. Marshals Service to seize more than $63,000 in Righthaven assets to satisfy a creditor’s judgment and costs."

more at the link!

:D

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:34 pm
Posts: 34464
Location: Richmond VA
They're going to file for BK. They're history but the cottage industry of shaking down webmasters isn't.

_________________
Defeat the Unindicted Felon

My photos can be found here


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:13 am 
Offline
POTD Giver Outer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 15355
Location: The Universe
Don't call me Mark. If anyone calls me Mark I kill em.

_________________
We Are Stardust

"Think occasionally of the suffering of which you spare yourself the sight". Albert Schweitzer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:35 am 
Offline
Giving liberals the blues
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 11:04 pm
Posts: 57450
Location: DFW, TX
Geez Mark, lighten up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 1:46 am 
Offline
POTD Giver Outer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 15355
Location: The Universe
I did not copy this.

_________________
We Are Stardust

"Think occasionally of the suffering of which you spare yourself the sight". Albert Schweitzer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:58 pm 
Offline
Just call me chuckles
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:14 am
Posts: 40811
I don't think people should be allowed to quote my entire post when they respond to it. I put a lot of work into my posts :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:43 am 
Offline
EZEKIEL 23:20
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:37 pm
Posts: 35380
Location: California
Clark wrote:
I don't think people should be allowed to quote my entire post when they respond to it. I put a lot of work into my posts :?

hmm:

_________________
BobLibertarian • Skeptic • Omnivore • Atheist • Californian • Voter • Father • Numismatist • Curmudgeon • Genius • Non-Smoker • Happy-Go-Lucky
Friends: Petescorner • saintguru • Goose • xpipe • SFDukie • gsaguy • HappyLittleTrees • tumuss • Clark • Gyocomgd • "Cats are for fags." -TheLiberator
FREE ANONYMOOSEAn Eternal Sportsmind For YouJESUS WAS A LIBERTARIANI don't care what you think as long as it's about me...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:18 am
Posts: 10273
flaminio wrote:
Clark wrote:
I don't think people should be allowed to quote my entire post when they respond to it. I put a lot of work into my posts :?

hmm:


Quoting, no copy and paste required.

_________________
Learn your label, you're not an individual.

In lieu of flowers the family asks rolls of Wheaties be sent.

Herself - building vocabularies one felony at a time.-dallasactuary


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 12:24 pm 
Offline
Just call me chuckles
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:14 am
Posts: 40811
Clark wrote:
I don't think people should be allowed to quote my entire post when they respond to it. I put a lot of work into my posts :?

That was over two years ago.

What the hell was I talking about? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 6:15 pm
Posts: 390
Clark wrote:
Clark wrote:
I don't think people should be allowed to quote my entire post when they respond to it. I put a lot of work into my posts :?

That was over two years ago.

What the hell was I talking about? :?


You was talking about his clamshell.

_________________
Clw54-We let you live in the hopes you will become a "focal point."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2011, Georgia Pig Productions
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group